Military-spending truths 

Every now and then Washington slips up, and a little bit of truth accidentally slips out of the carefully calibrated PR machine designed to keep the public ignorant about what's really going on.

This happened just recently when the Joint Chiefs of Staff testified before a U.S. Senate committee. To the surprise of the military brass, several Republican Senators suddenly hit them with rapid-fire accusations that they had been downplaying problems of troop shortages and aging weapons, leading to a drop in the "combat readiness" of American troops.

The New York Times reports that the five generals and admirals at the witness table were momentarily shellshocked by the barrage, but they quickly returned fire -- causing some truth to pop out.

The chiefs said they could have been putting billions more into troops and weapons if only the Congress would let them close unnecessary military bases and stop making them buy planes, ships and other expensive hardware that they haven't requested.

The military took aim at one especially wasteful chunk of congressional pork -- the purchase of 20 C-130 transport planes. The Air Force didn't want these planes, but Congress insisted -- or, more accurately, two members of Congress insisted. One was Newt Gingrich, the Loudspeaker of the House. The C-130s are built in Newt's home district, providing a nice government subsidy for his constituents (and for his re-election). The other was Trent Lott, the Senate majority leader, who got government facilities and payroll for his state by requiring the Pentagon to base these transport planes in Mississippi. As an Air Force general pointedly told the senators at the hearing, "Not only were the planes added `to our budget`, but then we're told where to put them."

Republicans claim the Pentagon needs more money, but it already gets $271 billion a year. That should cover troops and weapons -- if only Congress quits rolling out the pork barrel.

We welcome readers to submit letters regarding articles and content in Orlando Weekly. Letters should be a minimum of 150 words, refer to content that has appeared on Orlando Weekly, and must include the writer's full name, address, and phone number for verification purposes. No attachments will be considered. Writers of letters selected for publication will be notified via email. Letters may be edited and shortened for space.

Email us at

Orlando Weekly works for you, and your support is essential.

Our small but mighty local team works tirelessly to bring you high-quality, uncensored news and cultural coverage of Central Florida.

Unlike many newspapers, ours is free – and we'd like to keep it that way, because we believe, now more than ever, everyone deserves access to accurate, independent coverage of their community.

Whether it's a one-time acknowledgement of this article or an ongoing pledge, your support helps keep Orlando’s true free press free.

Speaking of Jim Hightower

More by Jim Hightower


Never miss a beat

Sign Up Now

Subscribe now to get the latest news delivered right to your inbox.

Read the Digital Print Issue

February 24, 2021

View more issues


© 2021 Orlando Weekly

Website powered by Foundation