Friday, October 14, 2011

Occupy Orlando to march tomorrow, in the meantime, recommended reading

Posted By on Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 4:22 PM

10-14-occupy-ketcham-jilanijpg
Tomorrow morning, Occupy Orlando—a movement drawing inspiration from the New York activists challenging the privileges wielded by the one percent of the wealthiest Americans (some of whom rake in such enormous sums of money, much of it taxpayer dollars, without performing any productive labor)—will begin the City Beautiful’s first indefinite physical protest in recent memory at 8:00 a.m. at Senator Beth Johnson Park, adjacent to the Orlando Regional Chamber of Commerce. A march downtown is scheduled for 11:30 a.m., that is, after groups of disgruntled Chase, SunTrust, and Bank of America customers return from canceling their respective accounts. I’ll be there tomorrow to witness the events, and will be writing much more about this in the coming week. But first, I figured I’d share a couple links of interest which I came across yesterday. First, there was this little gem which appeared on Facebook: “The Other Occupation: How Wall Street Occupies Washington.” The author, Zaid Jilani of ThinkProgress, is an old acquaintance of mine from Athens, Ga., and has written a refreshingly substantial piece, foregoing preaching in favor of reporting about the corroding influence of Wall Street money in the halls of Washington. Here’s an excerpt; the hyperlinks are Jilani’s.

From the deregulatory period of 1998 to 2009, the financial sector spent $3.3 billion on lobbyists. In 2007, the financial industry employed 2,996 separate lobbyists, five for every member of Congress. During the debate over financial reform last year, the industry flooded the nation’s capital with its own lobbyists. On just one issue — regulating derivatives — financial industry lobbyists outnumbered consumer group lobbyists and other pro-reform advocates by 11 to 1. In fact, by 2010, the industry had hired a whopping 1,600 former federal employees as lobbyists. Included among these lobbyists were high-ranking former public leaders like former Democratic House Majority Leader Dick Gephardt (MO) and Kenneth Duberstein, Ronald Reagan’s chief of staff. Much of this lobbying is done through elite K Street firms that specialize in hiring government insiders. Yet there are also bank-funded front groups like the Chamber of Commerce that deploy lobbyists on behalf of the big banks.

Both the magnitude of the institutions which the protestors are challenging (aka “The One Percenters”), and the comparably small grassroots, ostensibly leaderless composition of the Occupiers themselves (aka “The 99 Percenters”) reminded me of an essay by another acquaintance of mine, Christopher Ketcham, a freelance journalist who has written for magazines like Harper’s and GQ. This essay, entitled “The Curse of Bigness,” was published in Orion Magazine last March, though it’s certainly as instructive now as it was last year. It’s a lucid dissection of the problem of institutional size, and of the tendencies of larger corporations to keep themselves afloat through tax breaks, subsidies, bailouts, and other coerced concessions and protections from government which, ironically, reminds one of socialism.

“Marx, in his innocent, and now obsolete, way thought it would be the workers who would force the pace of socialism,” wrote John Kenneth Galbraith way back in the comparative innocence of 1985. “He must be looking with surprise at the way, in our time, it is the bankers and the big industrialists who lead the march, carry the flag.” And lo, swollen with government money, while the world economy immolated throughout the summer and fall of 2009, Goldman Sachs posted its largest profits ever.

In 1834, Roger B. Taney, who would become chief justice of the Supreme Court, warned about the supersized hostage-taking capacity of big concentrations in business. Listening to the bailout justifications throughout 2009, one could appreciate the fatefulness in Taney’s message. The big interests, he observed, “may now demand the possession of the public money . . . and if these objects are yielded to them from apprehensions of their power, or from the suffering which rapid curtailments on their part are inflicting on the community, what may they next not require? Will submission render such a corporation more forbearing in its course?” Ask Goldman Sachs.

Coincidentally, Ketcham has just published another essay for Orion entitled “The Reign of the One Percenters.” Take a look at that as well—it opens with some startling statistics about poverty and inequality in New York City—and perhaps I’ll see you tomorrow.

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Newsletters

Never miss a beat

Sign Up Now

Subscribe now to get the latest news delivered right to your inbox.

Calendar

© 2017 Orlando Weekly

Website powered by Foundation