VOTE FOR THE BEST OF ORLANDO® 2021 NOW THROUGH AUG. 1!

Thursday, April 4, 2002

Mr. and Ms. Demeanor

Movie: High Crimes

Posted on Thu, Apr 4, 2002 at 4:00 AM

***1/2
High Crimes
Studio: 20th Century Fox
Website: http://www.highcrimesmovie.com/main.html
Release Date: 2002-04-05
Cast: Ashley Judd, Morgan Freeman, Amanda Peet, Adam Scott, James Caviezel
Director: Carl Franklin
Screenwriter: Arnon Milchan, Janet Yang, Jesse Beaton-Franklin
WorkNameSort: High Crimes
Our Rating: 3.50

Most of us continue to like Ashley Judd and Morgan Freeman no matter how many lame movies they wind up in, so it's satisfying to report that "High Crimes" represents a slight upward shift in their good-will-to-good-pictures ratio.

In this pedestrian but inoffensive thriller, Judd plays Claire Kubik, a hotshot San Francisco lawyer who's like a cinematic version of Marcia Clark: She has a killer wardrobe, a stylish head of cropped hair and a can-do spirit that manifests itself in the occasional show of bird-flipping defiance. Claire's idyllic, carefully constructed existence is toppled when the FBI arrests her husband, Tom (Jim Caviezel), accusing him of being a fugitive military operative who murdered El Salvadoran civilians during a covert assignment in 1988. He denies the murder charges, but cops to the identity games. His real name, he admits to his wife, is not Tom Kubik but Ron Chapman.

Claire gets over this shock pretty quickly, and bravely steps up to commandeer her husband's defense in military court. For expert assistance, she turns to Charlie Grimes (Freeman), a self-professed wild card of an attorney whose intimate dealings with the Marines have left him suspicious of anyone in uniform. Together, these two underdog barristers poke holes in the government's case, uncovering a conspiracy that may reach to the upper echelons of the armed forces.

Much of what happens in "High Crimes" is utterly stupid, and almost all of it is derivative. But Judd and Freeman bring a zip to their characters that goes far beyond what's on the scripted page, and the film has a subtle populist undercurrent that's nearly subversive when placed in the current context. Almost all of the story's twists and turns support the old-fashioned leftie belief that civilian vigilance is the sole defense against widespread military corruption. This movie simply doesn't know there's a war on, and we're all the better for it.

Tags:

We welcome readers to submit letters regarding articles and content in Orlando Weekly. Letters should be a minimum of 150 words, refer to content that has appeared on Orlando Weekly, and must include the writer's full name, address, and phone number for verification purposes. No attachments will be considered. Writers of letters selected for publication will be notified via email. Letters may be edited and shortened for space.

Email us at feedback@orlandoweekly.com.

Support Local Journalism.
Join the Orlando Weekly Press Club

Local journalism is information. Information is power. And we believe everyone deserves access to accurate independent coverage of their community and state. Our readers helped us continue this coverage in 2020, and we are so grateful for the support.

Help us keep this coverage going in 2021. Whether it's a one-time acknowledgement of this article or an ongoing membership pledge, your support goes to local-based reporting from our small but mighty team.

Join the Orlando Weekly Press Club for as little as $5 a month.

Newsletters

Never miss a beat

Sign Up Now

Subscribe now to get the latest news delivered right to your inbox.

Read the Digital Print Issue

June 16, 2021

Calendar

© 2021 Orlando Weekly

Website powered by Foundation