SAVAGE LOVE 


There was a piece in the New York Times last weekend about the debate in the queer community — particularly in the lesbian community — over gender-reassignment surgery. Lots of formerly butch lesbians now identify as "transmen."

The strangest revelation was that after one member of a lesbian couple became a man, they were able to get legally married in California. I thought California didn't allow gay marriage. Doesn't the fact that a marriage is legal if one partner gets a sex change kind of turn all the anti-gay-marriage arguments on their head? I mean, how do you think the Bible-thumping Republicans would take to that argument? "No, you can't get married — well, I guess if one of you has a sex change it'll be okay." That's pretty fucked up, no?

Loyal Reader

Didn't you get the memo, LR? I'm supposed to lay off the gay-marriage issue for a while. But quickly …

Yeah it's fucked up, particularly when you read all of Paul Vitello's piece `"The Trouble When Jane Becomes Jack," Aug. 20` and learn that many transmen don't bother getting their genitals swapped out. Building a reasonably functional penis is a hell of a lot more complicated than building a reasonably functional vagina — so there's not much incentive for transmen to get an "ersatz penis," to use Vitello's term. Which means there are lots of double-vagina marriages in California and other states.

Still, it's not as fucked up as you might think. Gender isn't just about genitals — the mind is gendered, and some male minds are born into female bodies and vice-versa. While denying civil marriage to same-sex couples is an injustice, a fully transitioned transman — meaning he's got an "M" on his driver's license now, not an "F" — and a woman-born woman are an opposite-sex couple, penis or no penis. If society is going to reserve civil-marriage rights exclusively for opposite-sex couples, then you have to let transmen marry their female partners. But a lesbian couple being able to legally marry and keep on grinding their glazed donuts — as long as one of the women gets a double mastectomy, a few hormone shots and a soul patch — only goes to show how absurd our marriage laws are.

My sister has a client with a very unusual problem. When the client and his wife divorced, he agreed to pay alimony for 10 years or until she remarries. She is now in a lesbian relationship. They have exchanged rings, portray themselves as married, and she lists her partner as "spouse" on her child's school records. This man believes he should have the right to terminate alimony based upon his ex-wife's "remarriage." But marriage between two women is not legally recognized in this state, therefore there is a great deal of doubt as to how he would fare in front of a judge.

Doesn't this strike you as a major double standard that this woman can flaunt her lesbian, nonlegal "marriage" with impunity while she fucks her ex-husband royally?

Double Standards For Everyone

I suppose it's a double standard, DSFE, but it's not one I'm prepared to get exercised about. While I agree that this woman has an ethical obligation to turn down money that she's entitled to on a legal technicality, the fact remains that she is not married in the eyes of the law. That sucks for her, it sucks for her partner and it sucks royally for your sister's royally fucked client. I hope he's directing his anger not just at his ex-wife (she certainly deserves a share), but also at the federal government, bigoted judges and irrational fears that keep his ex-wife from legally marrying her "spouse."

I'm an 18-year-old girl, going off to college in September, and I'm not sure how to identify myself to people I'm meeting for the very first time. I can't say I'm a lesbian because it's inaccurate, and I'm certainly not straight. If given the choice between Brad and Angelina, I'd definitely go for her. I don't want to tell people I'm bisexual because 95 percent of the "bisexual" 18-year-old girls I've met were drunk straight chicks. So what do I say? "I'm a dyke, but I'll do boys, too"? "I'm bisexual, but not one of THOSE bisexuals"? Or should I just flirt with hot people and forget about labels?

Not One Of THOSE Bisexuals

Lots of young gay men run around telling people — particularly straight people — that they're "not like other gay people." What they mean is, "I'm not a skeezy slut." Some young lesbians insist they're "not like other lesbians," meaning they're not man-hating, pit-hair-braiding, makeup-fearing bulldykes. These stereotypes are not without foundation, of course. There are lots of skeezy gay sluts out there and tons of man-hating bulldykes. But it's unwise for young queers to confirm heterosexual prejudices by implying that they've just had the pleasure of meeting the one and only gay man on earth who isn't a skeezy slut or the one and only lesbian who isn't a man-hater.

Don't play this idiotic game, NOOTB, unless you want to mark yourself as an immature, shallow young queer. You can tell people you're bisexual without adding the self-hating bi-phobic qualifier. And then, through your behavior, you can demonstrate that you — like most bisexual girls — aren't just some drunk straight chick.

mail@savagelove.net

Speaking of Columns

Latest in Savage Love

More by Dan Savage

Readers also liked…

Newsletters

Never miss a beat

Sign Up Now

Subscribe now to get the latest news delivered right to your inbox.

Calendar

© 2016 Orlando Weekly

Website powered by Foundation